Why would Ackman be concerned with call holders? I don't think a company owes any fiduciary duty to the interests of listed options owners as these are just deriviatives. I've certainly never seen their interests cited before.
Why would Ackman be concerned with call holders? I don't think a company owes any fiduciary duty to the interests of listed options owners as these are just deriviatives. I've certainly never seen their interests cited before.
Why would Ackman be concerned with call holders? I don't think a company owes any fiduciary duty to the interests of listed options owners as these are just deriviatives. I've certainly never seen their interests cited before.