True, I totally see the margin point. CSV margins are very much in-line with SCI already. Although I would point out that SCI said it was able to get $100 mln in synergies from Stewart by 2016 ($55 in back office, $25 in purchasing and $20 in revenues synergies), so it was around 20% of target revenues at that time.
True, I totally see the margin point. CSV margins are very much in-line with SCI already. Although I would point out that SCI said it was able to get $100 mln in synergies from Stewart by 2016 ($55 in back office, $25 in purchasing and $20 in revenues synergies), so it was around 20% of target revenues at that time.
True, I totally see the margin point. CSV margins are very much in-line with SCI already. Although I would point out that SCI said it was able to get $100 mln in synergies from Stewart by 2016 ($55 in back office, $25 in purchasing and $20 in revenues synergies), so it was around 20% of target revenues at that time.