Hi, I just wanted to post a quick update on my post on the Networks from earlier today.
The post included the chart below. I highlighted that I had doubts about the CBS number, but directionally it was probably fine for the point I was making so I went with it.
In hindsight, that was too glib and pretty lazy of me. The CBS number is just way too low; I knew that but I didn't highlight it strongly enough. I don't want people thinking "CBS gets pennies per sub," so I wanted to run a correction.
The AMC number is probably roughly right. A simple check is AMC had ~90m subs in 2018 and had $1.47B in distribution revenue (see p. 38 of 10-k). That works out to ~$1.35/sub/month.
The right number for CBS is probably between $2-$3/sub. Networks generally don't make figuring out how much they get paid per sub easy (if they did, every distributor they negotiated with would know and use that against them), but you can spot check that number a few ways.
Anyway, my bottom line here is I didn't like how I left the AMC / CBS section in the original post. The general thesis holds: AMC and CBS are getting pretty similar retrans numbers despite CBS's shows being far, far more watched, but I wanted to provide an update with some more accurate numbers.
O, one more thing while I'm here. I think I've shared this chart before, but I wanted to throw it out there because it expresses my reasoning for liking the networks more than broadcasters so well. The chart below is from Gray (GTN) and shows retrans over time. Over ~five years, Gray's retrans revenue grew really rapidly, which is great if you're an investor! However, the percentage gray kept ("net retrans") dropped from ~75% in 2014 to ~50% by 2018 (and lower after factoring in the Raycom deal). I suspect the networks deliver significantly more than 50% of the value of a broadcaster, so overtime I'd expect that percentage to continue to tilt in network's favor.
Please read our disclaimer at https://yetanothervalueblog.